![]() It's a great guitar for the $850 that it costs and hey, it's a USA made Gibson with good woods, good pickups and that unmistakeable Gibson sound. IE: Cleans were fairly one dimensional to my ears, and I don't really care for the tone of the guitar for anything but raunchy rock flavours.Īll in all I think Gibson's onto a winner with the LP Studio Faded. The Burstbucker Pros take very well to that classic seventies/eighties school of arena rock esque tones and when you give 'em the juice, it is a glorious wonder! I wouldn't say that the sound of this guitar is overly versatile. I've tried this guitar through many different amps and to me, the solid mahogany construction sings best when plugged into a high gain British voiced amp such as a Marshall or Orange. These Fadeds despite being "cheap" Gibsons still sound every bit as good when turned up as their Standard and Custom model siblings. ![]() the LP into a Marshall is the pinnacle of rock guitar tone. turn every control to ten, plug into a good tube Marshall and hit an open A chord and it will sound amazing. Getting a good tone out of this guitar is dead simple. However, this guitar bucks a little bit of that because of the chambered body that it features (something Gibson has started doing as of 2006 to it's LP guitars) as well as the thin finish that makes the feel a bit faster. The design of the Les Paul was never one that I'd have considered ergonomic at all, because of it's rather clunky/limited upper fret access, the heavier weight, the single cutaway, and the fact it only has 22 frets. It's made in the USA and features a mahogany body and neck with a rosewood fretboard, Kluson tuners, tune-o-matic bridge and stopbar tailpiece, and a pair of Gibson Burstbucker Pro humbuckers. Often Gibsons feel glossy and sticky after hours of play, but that's not the case with this guitar. It is more satin feeling overall because it's not buffed out to a gloss so it is a bit slicker and faster to play and hold in my experience. This one features the very classic '70s looking "Worn Brown" colour, really awesome. What it offers differently is that the finish is not shiny and glossy using many buffed out coats of nitro lacquer, but rather it just uses pore filler and a couple of thin coats applied over top of it to provide a thinner "faded" finish. This guitar is basically considered to be a slightly cheaper alternative to the glossy Les Paul Studio model. They have a feel and tone that is pretty transparent within the Gibson line of guitars. These have a good build quality even though they are chambered. That is a good intro price for a Gibson Les Paul guitar. I have heard them A/B and I prefer the original style of build to the Gibson Les Paul's.Īt new you can find these for right around $899 or so. This cuts down on the girth and raunchiness of the tone in my opinion. This means they are somewhat hollow on the inside. What I don't like about he new Gibson Les Paul's are they are chambered. It is at a great price so there isn't too much to complain about. The tone is just not where I would like it to be. This is nice feeling guitars nonetheless. The neck feels good and smooth and like an old glove. Neck Pickup Burstbucker Pro Alnico Humbuckerīridge Pickup Burstbucker Pro Alnico HumbuckerĬontrols 2 x Volume, 2 x Tone, 3-way Pickup Toggle Most of their guitars feature mahogany wood throughout the body and they just have tone that Fender cannot match, not better or worse but just a different feel and tone all together.įingerboard Material Rosewood, 12" Radiusīridge/Tailpiece Tune-O-Matic Nashville Tune-O-Matic Gibson guitars have a girth and mystic that is distinctly Gibson. Gibson has successfully built guitars that reach to the highest of platform and have been played by the most famous musicians of all time. Gibson studio guitars are one of those guitars that match the demands of the budgeted musician.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |